Legal Opinion
Golan v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 21, 2010No. 09-1234, 09-1261PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action challenging the constitutionality of Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”), Pub.L. No. 103-465, § 514, 108 Stat. 4809, 4976-81 (1994) (codified as amended at 17 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 109), which granted copyright protection to various foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States. The district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, concluding that Section 514 violates plaintiffs’ freedom of expression under the First Amendment. In Case No. 09-1234, the government appeals the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Doe v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Golan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Doe v. ShurtleffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Rundquist v. VAPIANO SEDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McCraw v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.