Legal Opinion

Ososki v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 10, 2001No. 1:00-cv-10026PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

LAWSON, District Judge.

In an opinion filed on August 6, 2001, this Court held that the failure of a bearing in a traveling block which was part of a block-and-tackle assembly did not constitute a “collapse” of the structure to which it was attached, and therefore was not an event within the scope of coverage of an insurance policy which provided payment for damage incurred during oil drilling operations “caused by ... [the] collapse of a derrick or mast....” The plaintiff has now filed a motion in which he asks the Court to rehear the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Glen Coal Co. v. SealsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Marketing Displays, Inc. v. TrafFix Devices, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Indiana Insurance v. LiaskosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Genesys Health SystemsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Sigma Financial Corp. v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. Lewis v. Harlin (In Re Harlin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  4. Bye v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. Morrison v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API