State v. . Holbrook
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
The sole question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence offered by the State to warrant submission of the case to the jury. The defendant did not testify and offered no evidence. From the State’s evidence it appears that the defendant’s automobile, which he was at the time driving, was overturned as result of a collision on the highway, and there was found in his automobile a carton or case containing four unbroken bottles (fifths) of sloe gin. In the case with these bottles were three or four broken bottles from which some of the contents had leaked out. The witness…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . SuddrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. WolfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.