Legal Opinion

Fisher v. City of Berkeley

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 20, 2024No. 3:24-cv-08134Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DIANE FISHER, et al., Case No. 24-cv-08134-CRB 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION 10 v. FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 11 CITY OF BERKELEY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiffs Diane Fisher, Mark Tayne, and Staci Prado are unhoused individuals with 14 disabilities who live in Berkeley, California. They seek a temporary restraining order to 15 prevent the City of Berkeley from displacing them from their encampments. For the 16 following reasons, the Court DENIES their motion for emergency injunctive…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Kennedy v. City of RidgefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Arizona Students' Ass'n v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API