IME v. DBS
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Respondent, DBS, appeals by right the trial court’s decision to grant the request for a personal protection order (FEO) by petitioner, IME, through her next friend, GE, who is her father. Because we conclude there were no errors warranting relief, we affirm.
I. BASIC FACTS
These events have their origin in a prior incident that occurred when respondent was just 12 years of age. He was visiting the home of petitioner’s family at the time. GE walked into a room and discovered respondent with petitioner, who was just 6 years of age. Fetitioner was in a state of undress.
*429The county prosecutor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Gonzales/MartinezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. AssyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Trantham v. State Disbursement UnitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Jh v. JphMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Lkh v. AdbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020