Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Housing Authority of City of Camden, NJ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 26, 2003No. 1:02-cv-05931PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In this civil rights case, plaintiff, Sara Baldwin, argues that creditworthiness is not a criterion which the Housing Authority of the City of Camden (“HACC”) may properly consider in determining a lower income individual’s eligibility for Section 8 assisted rental housing vouchers. In that connection, plaintiff alleges that HACC and the individually named defendants 1 deprived her of due process by denying her application for Section 8 vouchers on…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carter v. Lynn Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Fincher v. South Bend Heritage FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Figgs v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Pasquince v. Brighton Arms Apts.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Daniels v. Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.