Legal Opinion

State v. Badessa

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 1, 2005No. 2004-180-M.PPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

“A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used.” — Mr. Justice Holmes 1

Who is a “first offender” for the purposes of the expungement statutes as codified at G.L.1956 §§ 12-1.3-1 to 12-1.3-3? Does the term “first offender” as defined in § 12-1.3-1(3) mean an individual with one and only one conviction, or does it apply to an individual attempting to expunge a first conviction, despite the presence of subsequent convictions on his record? The…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. Webster v. PerrottaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Lynch v. KingSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. In Re Advisory to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  2. Kells v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  5. State v. EnosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API