Frick Co. v. Ketels
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Douglas District Court. This was an action brought in the district court by the Merrimack Savings Bank and against Enut Ketels, Catherine Margaretta Louisa Ketels his wife, Julius Ketels, Mary Ketels his wife, Carl Ketels, The Frick Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Pennsylvania, and Erick & Company, another .corporation existing under the laws of Pennsylvania, the Kansas Loan & Trust Company, E. M. Sheldon and T. B. Sweet, upon…
Read the full summary
Error from Douglas District Court. This was an action brought in the district court by the Merrimack Savings Bank and against Enut Ketels, Catherine Margaretta Louisa Ketels his wife, Julius Ketels, Mary Ketels his wife, Carl Ketels, The Frick Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Pennsylvania, and Erick & Company, another .corporation existing under the laws of Pennsylvania, the Kansas Loan & Trust Company, E. M. Sheldon and T. B. Sweet, upon certain promissory notes, and to foreclose a real-estate mortgage executed to secure such notes. The defendants answered…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The Frick Company, a corporation, holding a mortgage upon all the real estate of Knut Ketels, including his homestead occupied by himself and wife and family, and the company prosecuting an action in the district court of Douglas county to foreclose such mortgage as against all such real estate, attempted, without the consent and against the will of the mortgagors, Ketels and wife, to release the mortgage of record as to that portion of the real estate not included in the homestead, and moved the court to dismiss its foreclosure action as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McArthur v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Colby v. CrockerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Dickson v. ChornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Brown v. CozardIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Butler & Co. v. StainbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- In Re Estate of DahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Blood v. MunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Mounce v. WightmanArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Postlethwaite v. EdsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.