Legal Opinion

Wiseman v. Batchelor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 8, 1993No. 93-396PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The appellant, Michael Wise-man, contends on appeal that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint with prejudice. His complaint alleged actual fraud and constructive fraud against the appellee, Fines Batchelor, who was the attorney for an opposing party in prior litigation. He further urges that the trial court erred in not allowing him to amend his complaint prior to dismissal. We disagree on both counts and affirm the dismissal with prejudice.

Michael Wiseman was involved in several lawsuits against Billie Weaver, who retained the appellee as his attorney.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deitsch v. TillerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Battle v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Miskimins v. City National Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Nicholson v. Century 21, Ivy Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Almand v. Benton County, Ark.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Clark v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. McDonald v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Born v. Hosto & Buchan, PLLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Country Corner Food and Drug, Inc. v. FIRST STATE BANK AND TRUST CO OF CONWAYSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API