Legal Opinion
Suture Express, Inc. v. Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2017No. 16-3065PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Suture Express, Inc. appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Cardinal Health 200, LLC (“Cardinal”) and Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc. (“O&M”) under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, Section 3 of the Clayton Act, and the Kansas Restraint of Trade Act (“KRTA”). See Suture Express, Inc. v. Owens & Minor Distrib., Inc., No. 12-2760-DDC-KGS, 2016 WL 1377342 (D. Kan. Apr. 7, 2016). Finding jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
Background 1
A. The Business
Suture Express, Cardinal, and O&M compete in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- MetLife, Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight CouncilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- W. v. Health Net Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- Healy v. Cox Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Inline Packaging, LLC v. Graphic Packaging Int'l, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.