Claxton v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

ORDER

J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.

Before the Court in the captioned case is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. no. 6.) Defendant has responded in opposition to the motion (doc. no. 7), and Plaintiff has replied (doc. no. 9). Defendant has, along with, its motion, filed a declaration with accompanying exhibits, and, in her response, Plaintiff has attached several exhibits and an affidavit. So that it could consider the entire record,…