Legal Opinion
Bowshier v. Chrysler Financial Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 26, 2001No. C-3-98-358PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 81)
RICE, Chief Judge.
This litigation arises from the attempts of Plaintiffs Jack A. Bowshier and Linda L. Bowshier to repurchase the assets and franchise of Hitchcock Auto Group, Inc. (“HAG”) and George W. Hitchcock (“Hitchcock”). As stated in their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs own the real property, known as 4815 Urbana Road, located in Springfield, Ohio, subject to a mortgage held by Defendant Chrysler Financial Corporation (“CFC”), formerly known as Chrysler Credit Corporation. In…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Advanced Analytics Laboratories, Inc. v. Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pasqualetti v. Kia Motors America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Lasmer Industries, Inc. v. Am General, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Newton v. KardashianDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- PFG Ventures, L.P. v. Brandon C. KennedyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.