Legal Opinion
Pasqualetti v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 2009No. Case 1:08-CV-02348PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), (Doc. 18), filed by Defendant, Kia Motors America, Inc. (“Kia”). The Plaintiffs, Frank Pasqualetti, Sr. and AAH & L, Inc. (collectively, “Pasqualetti”), have filed a brief in opposition (Doc. 20), Kia has filed a brief in reply (Doc. 22), and Pasqualetti has filed a sur-reply (Doc. 23), which the Court granted him leave to file. Accordingly, this matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons articulated below, Kia’s motion to dismiss is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Clayton Coffey v. Foamex L.P., and Recticel Foam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lundeen v. Smith-HokeOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Amatech Group Limited v. Federal Card Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Bonnie Sue OstranderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Daly v. New York Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Fabi v. Carter-Jones Companies, Inc., d/b/a Carter LumberDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.