Legal Opinion
Feyerchak v. Hiatt
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 4, 1948No. Civ. No. 3130; Habeas Corpus No. 212PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
The petitioner, a prisoner at the United iStates Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, asks leave to file in forma pauperis two proceedings which may be considered together. One document is captioned “Petition for Writ of Mandamus,” the other “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.”
The petition for writ of mandamus 1 alleges that “petitioner has consulted the official medical personnel of the institution hospital of the Lewisburg Penitentiary where he is confined, and has received no positive results through their diagnoses concerning a continuous pain that prevails in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reilly v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Hogan v. HillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
- Rothstein v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fussa v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Peretz v. HumphreyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Shargel v. HollisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Gager & Goldberg, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Kranz v. United States District Court of New JerseyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948