Legal Opinion
Shargel v. Hollis
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 27, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
This is an action in equity by plaintiff, a civil service employee of the Army, having veteran status, for relief against separation from the service.
Defendants, Brigadier General Robert P. Hollis, Commanding General of New York Quartermaster Purchasing Agency, hereinafter referred to as NYQMPA, James J. Reilly, Chief of the Civilian Personnel Office, NYQMPA, George M. Clarke, Jr., incumbent of the position of Chief of the Legal Office of NYQMPA, and Frederick N. Jones, named to the position of Chief of the Legal Office of the Quartermaster Inspection Service Command,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. HagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- De Pinho Vaz v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Reeber v. RossellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Wilson v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Federation of Government Employees Afl-Cio), Local 1904, Afge Afl-Cio), Local 1498, Afge Afl-Cio) v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1858 v. CallawayDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1975
- Hardy v. RossellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- American Federation (AFL-CIO) Local 1904 v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971