Legal Opinion
Town of Coventry v. Glickman
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided May 5, 1981No. 80-255-AppealPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLEHER, Justice.
The town of Coventry commenced this civil action in Superior Court, seeking an order enjoining Carl Glickman, William Ya-min, William Hoiles d. b. a. Woodland Development Co., and William Demarest (hereinafter Woodland) from dividing into individual lots a parcel of property located in Coventry. The trial justice denied the town’s request for injunctive relief and granted Woodland’s counterclaim for declaratory relief from the development restrictions imposed on them by the town.
The pertinent facts of this controversy are not in dispute. On December 27, 1956, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- A. T. & G., Inc. v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Hawkins v. TalbotSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Richards v. ZONING BOARD OF PROVIDENCESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
- Taylor v. MarshallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kirby v. Planning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
- Harmel Corp. v. Members of the Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Meridian Minerals Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Budget Inn of Daphne, Inc. v. City of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Keith v. Saco River Corridor CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.