Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2001No. Case No. 99CA2495PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Judge.

Gregory Moore appeals his sentence for violating R.C. 2925.11, possessing cocaine. Moore asserts that the trial court erred in imposing a maximum sentence that is to be served consecutively to a sentence that he was serving at the time of the incident. Because we find that the trial court did not set forth its reasons for imposing a maximum consecutive sentence as required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(2), we agree. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for resentencing.

I

In November 1998, a grand jury indicted Moore for possessing cocaine on June 29,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

State v. GriderOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
State v. StreeterOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
State v. Garrie, Unpublished Decision (10-16-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
State v. Huck, Unpublished Decision (12-7-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
State v. Huntley, Unpublished Decision (4-22-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.