Legal Opinion · Dissent

Meyer v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1930No. 3272Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Gkaham, Presiding Judge:

I am unable to agree to the conclusion reached by the majority in this case, for reasons which I shall briefly state.

The material involved is what is known as soup squares. On the hearing, it was stipulated by counsel that the merchandise is the same as that which was before the Board of General Appraisers in protest 961112, and, without objection, the record in that case was introduced in evidence in toto. In said record appears the appraiser’s advisory report in which he thus describes the merchandise:

Erbewurste (pea soup in rolls), and as soup…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ringk v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. American Smelting & Repining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API