Legal Opinion

Anderson v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1915No. 1504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36950 (T. D. 34933).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The importation in this case is described in the invoices as '‘Maggi’s desiccated soup in tablets.” The samples introduced are labeled '‘Maggi’s soups,” and bear also the name of the particular kind of flavor, such as “pease and haricots,” “white haricots,” and “green pease.” They are intended for use in making soup for human consumption. They were assessed as prepared vegetables under paragraph 252 of the tariff act of 1909, and are claimed to be dutiable as unonumerated manufactured articles under paragraph 480. There were other claims made in the protest, but the issue made in this court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Wakunaga of America Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API