Legal Opinion

Townsend v. McGrain

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 25, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 N.J. Super. 438 (1957)

128 A.2d 875

AUGUSTUS TOWNSEND AND WILLIAM TOWNSEND, T/A A. TOWNSEND & SON, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

JOHN McGRAIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 25, 1957.

Messrs. Dimon, Haines and Bunting, attorneys for plaintiffs (Mr. Martin L. Haines appearing).

Mr. George M. Hillman, attorney for defendants.

GOLDMANN, J.S.C. (orally).

Plaintiffs bring this action to set aside a conveyance made by defendants McGrain to defendants Haines as being in fraud of creditors. The parties have agreed that the cause may be determined upon the following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCaslin v. SchoutenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of DickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Gradman v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LangCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. In re National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Forman v. Jeffrey Matthews Financial Group, LLC (In Re Halpert & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  2. United States v. MazzaraDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
  3. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  4. In re: DBMP LLC, Official Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants, and Sander L. Esserman, in his capacity as Legal Representative for Future Asbestos Claimants, each on behalf of the estate of DBMP LLC v. CertainTeed LLC, CertainTeed Holding Corporation, and Saint-Gobain CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API