Wilhelm v. Baumann
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Burleson County; Ed. R. Sinks, Judge. Action by Julius Baumann against Herman Wilhelm'. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.
Although the petition upon which this case was tried was in the form of trespass to try title, the testimony made it a boundary case; and, from a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed.
The only reversible error is that pointed out in the second assignment; the objection being that the judgment does not settle the controversy between the parties. The land in controversy is described in the plaintiff’s petition as part of a 150-acre tract belonging to the plaintiff, and by metes and bounds as follows: “Beginning at a point in the E. line of said 150-acre tract, 800 vrs. S. 3½ W.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Provident National Bank v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Reed v. CavettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Edwards v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Ballard v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by16 opinions
- Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- First Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. ElginNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Lone Star Development Corp. v. Reilly, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Permian Oil Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Carter v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.