Legal Opinion

Kraebel v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 19, 1992No. 444, Docket 91-7665PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Barbara Kraebel, d/b/a Barklee Realty Company, appeals pro se from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Mary Johnson Lowe, Judge, dismissing her complaint against the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development and the New York City Department of Finance (together, “the city”). Kraebel, who is the owner and landlord of a sixteen-unit residential apartment building, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that the city’s improper administration of two municipal…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kraebel v. New York City Department Of Housing Preservation And DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Cronin v. Town of AmesburyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  3. Veterans for Common Sense v. Eric K. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Walter v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Veterans for Common Sense v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API