Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Kelley

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 2008No. 104,135PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.

{11 Plaintiff, Chris Hastings, appeals an award of $26,600-plus in attorney fees and costs in favor of Defendant, Thomas M. Kelley. Defendant counter-appeals, asserting he is entitled to double that amount. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

2 Plaintiff and Defendant are neighbors. While the record does not contain all the pleadings, it indicates Plaintiff sued Defendant to enforce a protective covenant which allegedly prohibited Defendant from setting up a batting cage on his side yard. The lawsuit was brought pursuant to 60 0.98.2001 § 856, which allows one resident of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Young v. SpencerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Capital One Bank, N.A. v. ParsonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. MILL CREEK LUMBER & SUPPLY CO. v. BICHSELCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API