United States v. Darnell Sydney Boult
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Darnell Boult appeals from the sentence imposed upon him after he pled guilty to a charge of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1988). He argues that the district court 1 erred by adding two levels to his total offense conduct level under United States Sentencing Guideline Section 3A1.1, relating to vulnerable victims. Boult contends that this determination was clearly erroneous and that Guideline Section 3A1.1 is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm the sentence imposed by the district court.
Boult and co-defendant, Adrian Mullen, stipulated to the facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Efrain Velasquez-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. SeligsohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Steven R. Newman, A/K/A Richard Newman, A/K/A Richard Genovese, A/K/A John RomeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Paul David AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Gary PaigeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Brenda CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.