Legal Opinion
Tourangeau v. Uniroyal, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1999No. CIV.A. N-86-208(AHN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
NEVAS, District Judge.
This action arises under a pension and welfare benefit plan insurance policy which the third-party defendant, National Union Fire Insurance Co. Of Pittsburgh, Pa. (“NU”), issued to Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company (“UGTC”), successor in interest to Uniroyal, Inc.1
Presently pending before the court is NU’s motion to dismiss or strike the third-party complaint filed by UGTC. The complaint seeks reimbursement under a NU policy for defense costs UGTC incurred in connection with an action filed in 1994 by the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthoritAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Straus v. Prudential Employee Savings PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014