State v. Cheren

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 137.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CHEREN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Cheren,

1995-Ohio-28.] Appellate procedure—Successive applications for reopening appeal from judgment and conviction based on claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel—Application denied—App.R. 26(B) makes no provision for filing successive applications to reopen. (No. 95-427—Submitted June 6, 1995—Decided August 16, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 15752. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, Oles Cheren,…