Legal Opinion
State v. Wogenstahl
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 2024No. 2023-0945PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 317.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WOGENSTAHL, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Wogenstahl,
2024-Ohio-4714.] App.R. 26(B)—Delayed application to reopen direct appeal of capital-murder conviction—Appellant failed to show good cause for the delay in filing his application to reopen—Claim that trial court lacked jurisdiction over appellant’s case is barred by this court’s caselaw precluding the filing of a successive application to reopen and by res judicata—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2023-0945—Submitted…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WogenstahlOhio Supreme Court · 2024