State v. Cheren
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We held in State v. Peeples (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 149, 652 N.E.2d 717, decided today, that a prisoner has no right to file successive applications for reopening. Once ineffective assistance of counsel has been raised and adjudicated, res judicata bars its relitigation. See State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175, 39 O.O.2d 189, 226 N.E.2d 104. In this case, appellant has raised two prior claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in his prior applications to reopen. This court has already determined appellant’s counsel was effective. State v. Cheren (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 138, 652 N.E.2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. PeeplesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CherenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. TwyfordOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. CherenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Huber, Unpublished Decision (6-28-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. CowanOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.