Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided March 10, 2010No. 09-09-00301-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

Jeffery Paul Schroeder 1 appeals the trial court’s judgment; he claims that his indictment was defective because it was not presented on or before the 180th day after his date of commitment. Tex.Code CRIM. Proc. Ann. art. 82.01 (Vernon 2006). Schroeder asserts “that error was committed by the Trial Court when [it] denied the ‘Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment.’ ” Because we find the trial court did not err in denying the motion, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Background

Jeffery Paul Schroeder was arrested on June 9, 2008, for the offense of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Ex Parte SeidelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Coit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Tapps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte: Michael Wayne Turner, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2020
  2. Jerryl Robinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  3. Juan Francisco Maldonado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API