Schroeder v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
Jeffery Paul Schroeder 1 appeals the trial court’s judgment; he claims that his indictment was defective because it was not presented on or before the 180th day after his date of commitment. Tex.Code CRIM. Proc. Ann. art. 82.01 (Vernon 2006). Schroeder asserts “that error was committed by the Trial Court when [it] denied the ‘Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment.’ ” Because we find the trial court did not err in denying the motion, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Background
Jeffery Paul Schroeder was arrested on June 9, 2008, for the offense of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Ex Parte SeidelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Coit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Tapps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.