Legal Opinion

Coit v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1991No. 529-87PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

In a trial to the court, appellant, Wendy Lee Coit, was found guilty of failing to maintain financial responsibility, in violation of § lC(a) of the Safety Responsibility Law, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. art. 6701b. 1 Punishment was assessed at a fine of $101. Appellant contended on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction, but the Third Court of Appeals disagreed. Coit v. State, 728 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review, pursuant to Tex.R.App.Pro.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Ex Parte CumminsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. State v. MasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API