Legal Opinion

In re Klein

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application by Henry Klein, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Buedingen Manufacturing Company, to compel George V. Fleckenstein, an attorney at law, to pay over certain moneys collected by him as attorney for the bankrupt. Order that the attorney pay over a certain sum, with interest.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

In July, 1905, the petitioner, Henry Klein, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Buedingen Manufacturing Company, procured an order for George V. Fleckenstein to show cause at the Special Term appointed to be held at the courthouse in the city of Rochester on the 31st day of July, 1905, why he should not be compelled to pay over certain moneys collected by him as attorney for the Buedingen Manufacturing Company, for which corporation he had acted as attorney. On the return of said show cause order an order was made at such Special Term, referring the matter to the Honorable Frank Rice, of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Application of KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Jackson v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Jackson v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Gillespie v. MulhollandNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maljak v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Maljak v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API