Legal Opinion

People v. Earket

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently enter that plea (see, People v Sparrow, 222 AD2d 1114, lv denied 87 NY2d 977). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J.— Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SparrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SnitzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Snitzel v. MurryDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API