Legal Opinion

People v. Sparrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently enter that plea (see, People v Jordan, 215 AD2d 257; People v Bridges, 186 AD2d 298). Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal encompassed the right to challenge whether affording defendant the opportunity to participate in a treatment program prior to sentencing constituted an impermissible term of "interim probation” and whether the sentence is harsh or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. BridgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. VallejoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. LaValleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. DowningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. EarketAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API