Legal Opinion
People v. Snitzel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review the contention in his pro se supplemental brief that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered (see, People v Earket, 256 AD2d 1194, lv denied 93 NY2d 873). The further contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel’s failure to make appropriate motions is without merit. To the extent that defendant’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ChieraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. SpeedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. EarketAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. BlackwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. SkyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. KazmirskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. ReddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.