Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Crandall

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 15, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Construction of will and codicil on application for revocation of probate. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

John Crandall, on the 2nd day of April, lSVl, while a resident of this county, executed his last will and testament, whereby he gave: “ First.— To my beloved wife, Eliza M. Crandall, all my property, both real and personal, during her natural life, in lieu of right of dower; and I hereby authorize my executors to sell my real estate, whenever in their judgment it shall be best for the interests of the estate. Second.—After the death of my wife, I give and bequeath one half of my property to the Seventh Day Baptist Education Society, one fourth to the American Sabbath Tract…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hollis v. . Drew Theological SeminaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. White v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Phelps' v. . PondNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Lefevre v. . LefevreNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tallman v. TallmanThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  2. In re Benedict's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889
  3. In re the Estate of IsbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API