Legal Opinion

Plaatje v. Plaatje

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1981No. 12803PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIORDAN, Justice.

Plaintiff, the former wife of the defendant, brought an action to recover a share of the past and future military retirement benefits paid to the defendant. The rights to the benefits had not been determined in the earlier divorce proceeding. After a trial, the district court dismissed the complaint on grounds that the plaintiff was barred from bringing an action by the four year statute of limitations contained in Section 37-1-4, N.M.S.A.1978. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff and defendant were married in New Mexico on February 28, 1965. At the time of their marriage, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. LeClert v. LeClertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Copeland v. CopelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Phillips v. WellbornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Village of Angel Fire v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Village of Angel Fire v. COLFAX CO. BCCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Berry v. MeadowsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Beggs v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  5. STATE EX REL. PERA v. LongacreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API