Legal Opinion

LeClert v. LeClert

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1969No. 8700PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Chief Justice.

This appeal requires our determination as to whether the “retainer pay” to which plaintiff Arthur Charles LeClert, a Naval officer, will become entitled upon his retirement from the Armed Forces after his divorce is community property subject to division in a divorce proceeding.

Plaintiff served as an officer in the United States Navy since 1943, and pursuant to 10 U.S.C.A. § 6323(e) was ordered to be retired on July 1, 1968. He and the defendant Alice Lindhorst LeClert were married in 1949 and were divorced March 12, 1968. The decree awarded the defendant alimony…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Mora v. MoraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Campbell v. CampbellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Kirkham v. KirkhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Morris v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Busby v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cearley v. CearleyTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Kuchta v. KuchtaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API