In Re Sealed Case
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RELEASE ON BOND
GADOLA, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Before the Court is a stipulation for Defendant’s release on bond pending sentencing in this criminal case. The intended purpose of this release is to afford Defendant the opportunity to cooperate with the Government. The Court will deny release on bond because (1) Defendant’s detention in this situation is mandatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2), and (2) the Court lacks jurisdiction to determine whether any exceptional reasons, under 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c), merit the release of Defendant.
II. ANALYSIS
A.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson, Mark Stimpson Allen BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Bao Deng ChenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
- United States v. HarrisonDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2006
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
- United States v. RauschDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.