Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. Espeed, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff has two patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,766,304 (the ’304 patent), and 6,772,-132 (the ’132 patent). Both relate to a software program for use in electronic trading in futures. The software program combines a static ladder price column with moving bid and asked market data, together with a single-action order entry. Defendant came into the market with its own software program. It does not argue that its first program is non-infringing. Rath er, it changed its program and contends that the new program does not infringe. It also…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007