Lytle v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
209 S.W.3d 421 (2005)
Anthony Joseph LYTLE, Appellant
v.
STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
No. CA CR 04-844.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, IV.
June 8, 2005.
David W. Talley, Jr., Magnolia, for appellant.
Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Laura Shue, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge.
Appellant Anthony Joseph Lytle was charged with over-possession of pseudoephedrine, possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, and possession of drug paraphernalia. After a jury trial, he was convicted of over-possession of pseudoephedrine and acquitted of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.