Legal Opinion

Lytle v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 2005No. CA CR 04-844Published

1Opinion of the Court

209 S.W.3d 421 (2005)

Anthony Joseph LYTLE, Appellant

v.

STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

No. CA CR 04-844.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, IV.

June 8, 2005.

David W. Talley, Jr., Magnolia, for appellant.

Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Laura Shue, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge.

Appellant Anthony Joseph Lytle was charged with over-possession of pseudoephedrine, possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, and possession of drug paraphernalia. After a jury trial, he was convicted of over-possession of pseudoephedrine and acquitted of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API