Gross v. Sunding
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Phil Gross and Kenyon Sunding were involved in an accident. Gross filed his complaint shortly before the three year statute of limitations ran on his claim. Sunding was out of state but indicated that he would accept service on his return. Gross failed to serve Sunding within the statutorily provided 90 day tolling period. Gross argued that Sunding had entered into an alternate service agreement, waived the affirmative defense of insufficient service, and was estopped from claiming insufficient service. The trial court granted Sunding’s motion for summary judgment based on insufficient…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Barrie v. Hosts of America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Clifton Whidbee v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Scanlan v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Gross v. SundingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Harvey v. ObermeitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Streeter-Dybdahl v. Nguyet HuynhCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.