Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Perea

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2000No. 20,536PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company appeals the district court’s decision to confirm an arbitration award in favor of Defendant Antonio Perea rather than consider the facts and issues in a de novo district court trial. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

{2} Defendant Perea was injured in an automobile collision involving a minimally insured driver with $25,000 coverage. That driver’s insurer paid Defendant the $25,000 policy limit. Defendant then demanded of his own insurer, Allstate, payment of under-insured motorist benefits. Because Defendant had one Allstate policy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jaramillo v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sandoval v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Rodriguez v. Windsor InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ferrell v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Progressive Specialty InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ferrell v. Allstate Insurance Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. ProgressiveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API