Allstate Insurance v. Perea
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company appeals the district court’s decision to confirm an arbitration award in favor of Defendant Antonio Perea rather than consider the facts and issues in a de novo district court trial. We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
{2} Defendant Perea was injured in an automobile collision involving a minimally insured driver with $25,000 coverage. That driver’s insurer paid Defendant the $25,000 policy limit. Defendant then demanded of his own insurer, Allstate, payment of under-insured motorist benefits. Because Defendant had one Allstate policy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jaramillo v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Sandoval v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Rodriguez v. Windsor InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Ferrell v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Progressive Specialty InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Ferrell v. Allstate Insurance Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. ProgressiveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.