Legal Opinion
Haltiwanger v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 1977No. 10325, 10891PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
Appellants appeal from nonjury misdemeanor convictions of possession of a narcotic drug (D.C.Code 1973, § 33-402); possession of implements of a crime — narcotics implements (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3601); and unlawful possession of a pistol after conviction of a felony (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3203). Together they challenge the sufficiency of the evidence as to the possession offenses and the seizure of the pistol. Sheffield also makes the narrow assertion that the trial court erred in using the Bail Agency report as a predicate for judicially knowing a district court felony…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Joseph B. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Bailey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hooker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- James v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. CiceroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Kendrick Albert Cicero, A/K/A Kenny, A/K/A Diamond, A/K/A Paul Haynes, A/K/A Albert Kenrich CiceroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Kendrick Albert Cicero, A/K/A Kenny, A/K/A Diamond, A/K/A Paul Haynes, A/K/A Albert Kenrich CiceroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994