Legal Opinion

United States v. Kendrick Albert Cicero, A/K/A Kenny, A/K/A Diamond, A/K/A Paul Haynes, A/K/A Albert Kenrich Cicero

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 10, 1994No. 92-3222Published

1Opinion of the Court

22 F.3d 1156

306 U.S.App.D.C. 74, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1075

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Kendrick Albert CICERO, a/k/a Kenny, a/k/a Diamond, a/k/a

Paul Haynes, a/k/a Albert Kenrich Cicero,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-3222.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 7, 1994.

Decided May 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Howard F. Bramson (appointed by the Court), argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

James A. Meade, Asst. U.S. Atty., argued the cause for appellee. With him on the briefs…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Gary Anthony PatrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API