Bailey v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
Appellant has been convicted of two counts of receiving stolen property1 consisting of a handbag and a wallet together with contents of each. Her contentions on appeal relate to the seizure and search of the handbag found at her feet when she was arrested. It is specifically contended (1) that the extent of the search was unreasonable because appellant could have been moved away from the handbag thus eliminating danger to the police by appellant’s ready access to it; (2) that there was sufficient police control of the situation to render their asserted apprehension…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Jesse Vance MehcizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Campbell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- United States v. MasonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. VasquezArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.