Legal Opinion

Sims v. Petaluma Gas Light Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1901No. S.F. No. 2215PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The complaint in this case contains two counts. The first declares upon a contract in writing alleged to have been entered into between Harvey J. Lewelling and Stephen W. Van Syekel, partners in business under the name and style of Lewelling & Van Syekel, and the defendant gas company, August 20, 1896. It is alleged that by the terms of said contract Lewelling and Van Syekel agreed to build and erect certain water gas apparatus at the gas works of said defendant, in Petaluma, California, for the purpose of manufacturing gas from crude oil or distillate, by a process known as the Van Sickle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Graves v. Mono Lake Hydraulic Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Stearns v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Dean v. ShingleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API