Legal Opinion
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 21, 2002No. CIV.99-4228PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, Chief Judge.
The defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 53, relating to the original complaint in this action. The Court then granted the Yankton Sioux Tribe’s (the “Tribe”) request to file an amended complaint. The defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, Doc. 61. These motions have been fully briefed by the parties and they will be decided based upon the written record herein. The motions will be denied as to the Tribe’s claims under the Native American Grave Protection and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. ImpsonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2005