Legal Opinion

Snead v. Redland Aggregates Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1993No. 92-8389PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

I

A

Edwin de Steiguer Snead, a plaintiff, is the chairman of Georgetown Railroad Co. (“Georgetown”), another plaintiff. In 1984, Snead and his brother Bill 1 began designing and building a new type of railroad car that they called a “dump train,” which consists of a group of open-topped railroad hopper cars joined together and to a transfer car. A conveyer belt runs under each hopper car to the transfer car. Because each hopper car has sloping side walls and gates in the bottom, bulk material can be discharged easily from the cars onto the conveyer belt, which then…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  2. Levinsky's, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Quigley v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc. v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Lisa and Roger French v. Marco French, G.T. Morton, and Judy McCollum, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API