Quigley v. Rosenthal
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Saul Rosenthal and the Anti-Defamation League appeal the district court’s entry of judgment, following a jury trial, on plaintiffs’ claims against them under the federal wiretap act1 for using intercepted cordless telephone conversations, and under Colorado state law for defamation, invasion of privacy by intrusion, and false light invasion of privacy. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, reverse the judgment on plaintiffs’ invasion of privacy by intrusion and false light invasion of privacy claims, and affirm the remainder of the judgment.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Tire Engineering & Distribution, LLC v. Shandong Linglong Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- ECCLESIASTES 9: 10-11-12, INC. v. LMC Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.