Dougherty v. State

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Edward Dougherty guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol. Dougherty appeals, arguing that the trial court should have suppressed the results, of his Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test. He also asks us to remand this case to the trial court for a hearing on alleged illegalities in the jury’s composition. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. In three enumerations of error, Dougherty argues that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence of his breath test. We find no error.(a) First, Dougherty claims that the test results were inadmissible…